Sometimes I
write about things people don’t care to read. Like, for instance, this.
There’s no use lying, this was prompted by the Gentleman with the Thistle-down hair who, despite being a complete and utter bastard by human moral standards, has become one of my favourite characters ever. Then again, I’ve always been drawn to bastards so what difference do human or fairy morals make? Though, to be perfectly honest, I’d rather not be thinking about this topic at all, because what I know of fairy morals comes mainly from one book which creeped me out so much I couldn’t sleep for two days. Of course this kind of knowledge actually amounts to pretty much nothing because -at least I hope- fairies are imaginary creatures and everything is fine and I won’t be creeped out this time. Coming up, fairy vs. human morals and why the Gentleman with the Thistle-down hair isn’t really a complete and utter bastard.
Fairy tales
and fables often portray fairies as carefree, cheerful creatures who like to
dance in the moonlight that can sometimes be deceitful, just for fun. It’s
mostly harmless, unless an unaware passerby happens to be lured away to a fairy
kingdom for a few hours, only to return home and realize 200 years have passed
and all their loved ones are now dead. Or a fairy grants them a wish and they
find out that the fairy has a concept of language that twists nice wishes into
nightmares. These are horrible things to do which means that nymphs and pixies
must in fact be evil. Why drag a person away from their world, their family,
their life for a few hours of frolicking if it means that person will be
miserable when they return to their realm? Why torture them with wishes that
backfire and leave them to deal with the consequences? The answer is they
probably don’t care.
Perhaps
fairies view humans as curiosities which spark their interest until they turn
out to be unsophisticated, tedious trinkets which are then discarded into a
pile of rejected toys. Perhaps they only care about having their fun without
considering how humans feel. That must be truly evil. Except good and evil, as
we perceive these concepts, may vary slightly or considerably from culture to
culture or even from person to person. Why would an altogether different
species from a different realm share the same beliefs as humans? If you asked a
fairy -which I wouldn’t attempt to do even if someone paid me- about why they
don’t return people home sooner instead of letting them dance away a couple of
human lifetimes, you’d probably find out they have no concept of time. Or in
the case of wishes gone wrong, they would most likely return the blame by
saying humans don’t realize language’s full potential and end up misusing it.
They might not even respond because human questions could seem trivial to a
fairy and why bother answering when there’s so much dancing to be done?
The
Gentleman likes his fun. He likes dancing and spectacles and collecting pretty
things. And of course he sees nothing wrong with that because his set of moral
principles is entirely different than ours. He doesn’t see anything wrong with
keeping Lady Pole awake every night because it was agreed that he could have
half her life as recompense for helping with her resurrection. He doesn’t like Jonathan Strange so why would
it be wrong to badger him? Vinculus is a threat to the Gentleman and it stands
to reason that threats must be eliminated. And when it comes to snatching Arabella- she’s
a pretty thing to look at, a seashell on the beach that he’s very fond of and
keeping her at Lost Hope isn’t bad because he’s enchanted her to be happy there.
It doesn’t matter if that feeling of happiness is fabricated, it only matters
that it exists.
Trying to humanize
the Gentleman, people seem to be reading more into his attentions to Steven. He
spends more time with Steven than all his other toys and seems to value him
more as well but still, he manipulates him and keeps him at Lost Hope
disregarding the fact that Steven doesn’t want to be there, gives him gifts for
which Steven has no use and despite the fact that he appears to be somewhat
impressed with him, he doesn’t treat him any better than he would any servant. Steven
is yet another ornament to the Gentleman and that is perfectly acceptable, by
fairy standards. Each human the Gentleman associates with is precisely that, an
ornament, a bauble or a gadget. Perhaps he gets more attached to some of them
but even those dispensable.
That
evidence isn’t enough to classify the Gentleman as evil though, because he
doesn’t abide by human morals. To expect otherwise would be unrealistic (and
yes, I know using the term “unrealistic” in a document discussing fairies
sounds ridiculous). To us earthlings, his behaviour seems cruel and malicious
because we can’t help but judge him by our standards, which are standards of a
world entirely different than the one he comes from. And we can’t, of course,
distance ourselves from the morals we’ve been taught and accustomed to, our
perception of good and evil. But the truth is that the Gentleman with the
Thistle-down hair isn’t evil. He just… is.
8 claims:
Wonderful, wonderful!
Yes, this is just perfect. So many people don't seem to understand at all (not least Marc Warren, drat the man).
The Gentleman isn't evil. Not in the least. He's only ever malicious toward those who deserve it, one way or another, and so munificent toward those he's taken a liking to! He is a wonderful person, truly, even if those he favors don't have the ability to appreciate his gifts properly.
In any case, don't you think that the attention of a fairy is worth the sacrifice of what would otherwise have been an entirely unremarkable human life?
...Actually, it seems you don't—but I can't think why.
@Anders Unmenschlich
Well, it all depends on what kind of attention it is, doesn't it? Truth is I appreciate all ten of my fingers and though I do like dancing, I also like sleeping and I wouldn't want to miss out on that. There are several other reasons of course but I'm afraid I'd bore you to death trying to explain.
Also, I don't believe any human life is unremarkable or any life in general for that matter. But think of this, if you will. If the Gentleman thought his fairy life is so remarkable, why would he visit the human realm so often? Why would he want to be around humans so much? It seems to me he wasn't having so much fun or he wouldn't constantly be trying to bring human elements into the mix. I think, I thiiiiink... the Gentleman enjoys his fairy nature but not his fairy life and that could just as well apply to any other fairy really.
@Lu
Depends... does it really? Hm.
Well, everything has a price. The Gentleman certainly believes that what he has to offer is worth a good deal more than any price you could pay, and I can't say I disagree—though obviously there seem to be other points of view. It's rather sad that value has to be so subjective. Not that you should give up anything more than you have to for a little magic in your life! Of course you always want the best deal. The women who died because of a kiss and a name, for example, were certainly unfortunate. It's a shame a better bargain wasn't available for them.
Did the Gentleman really visit the human realm so very often? Could he not have opened the doors from his side, if he'd really wanted to? Norrell caught his attention and reminded him of a world he hadn't played in for a good long while, that's all. Oh, yes, he probably could have had fun in the human realm for centuries—but that's not so very long for a fairy, is it?
Ooh, by the way, which book creeped you out so much you couldn't sleep for two days?
@Anders Unmenschlich
From my perspective, it depends on what you're willing to give up in order to frolic with fairies. I suppose that some people would gladly sacrifice a finger in order to do that. It's just not my cup of tea.
You do have a point. And I'm happy to blame Norrell for most things so I agree with you on that.
As for the book, it was a Greek one and I'm pretty sure there aren't any translated versions of it. It discussed fairy lore and tried to distinguish between fact and fiction. I have to admit it was very interesting but a few... characters that were mentioned in it were far too menacing, in my opinion.
@Lu
That's the tragedy of values dissonance, isn't it? What the Gentleman offers is, so far as he's concerned, beyond price: and he's practically giving it away! But because Emma and Stephen and Arabella don't share his values, they can't help but be entirely ungrateful, to the point of thinking of themselves as victimised rather than favoured. It's very sad.
I taught myself Japanese so I could read a book—I have no objection to learning Greek for the same reason. Will you give me the title?
@Anders Unmenschlich
It's "Fairies" by Naoum Theodosiades. And here's a link. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12405022
Let me know if you ever manage to read it!
@Lu
Excellent! Thank you, Φωτεινή Αλεξακη, very much.
I will certainly repay you in the way you request, should your condition be met (and I very much intend to meet it). Though I fear I may not make it in time—Japanese took me the better part of a decade to master, and that is, what, a full fifth of your remaining lifespan, barring accidents? Never mind. It isn't as though I'm precisely immortal myself, after all, is it?
Thank you again, and in case I don't learn Greek enough to read "Fairies" in time to tell you about it: May your dreams be what you looked for when you find them.
@Anders Unmenschlich
Thank you and good luck with all your endeavours, linguistic or not.
Post a Comment